Self-taught, hands-on. My eye for what's off came from the work — reviewing 200+ business sites a day at Google, quality-checking sensitive data at Informdata. Building my own tools powered that eye up: now I don't just spot the gap, I build the system that closes it — and operate it day to day.

I'm a self-taught systems builder. I don't build for its own sake — I build to make an operation run itself, then I run it. The thing I keep coming back to: building my own tools made my day-to-day seamless, where everything talks to everything and the busywork disappears.
The eye for detail is real, and it's earned — years on Google's team reviewing hundreds of business websites a day for what worked and what didn't, and nights at Informdata quality-checking sensitive records under strict standards. When you've inspected that much, that carefully, you notice what's off fast.
Then I started building. The eye got powered up by tool-building — when you build the pipes, you feel the moment something leaks, and you're the one who can fix it.
DuberyMNL isn't a landing page — it's an operation. I built each piece and the wiring between them: AI content & image generation, a storefront and funnel, a Messenger chatbot that captures leads into a CRM, Meta ad operations, and a command center that ties it all into one place. The payoff isn't a vanity metric — it's that what would normally take a small team, one person can run.
AI captions + product/lifestyle visuals, generated on-brand at scale
Landing page + product pages, the path from click to order
Answers, qualifies, and closes — with guardrails
Every real lead captured, scored, and followed up
Monitors & controls all of it — orders, inventory, KPIs, lead recovery, bot controls. Zero-terminal operation.
I work across the stack — automation, AI generation, integrations, and the dashboards that make it all observable.
The detail-eye is a real skill, earned from quality-grade work and sharpened by building. When you own the system, you don't just file the bug — you fix it.
The instinct is earned — years reviewing sites at Google, checking data at Informdata. The upgrade is that I now pair it with the data: I don't guess where users struggle, I read it.
Watching the live site's behavior in Microsoft Clarity, I caught what you'd never see by eyeballing a design — dead clicks (people tapping things that looked clickable but didn't respond), and a slow load I traced to heavy, uncompressed images. I compressed them, and the page started painting fast.
Each signal became a fix on the list. That's the loop I run: build it → watch how real people use it → catch what's off → fix it.
I use Clarity and the Meta pixel as signal to guide the build — practical, not a specialty I'd oversell.
Users tapping elements that don't respond — 38 across the funnel
Uncompressed images bloating load — compressed them, faster paint
Visitors leaving fast after landing — friction signal